Neri Oxman gave a talk, “Mediated Matter,” at Ontario College of Art and Design. She argues that material should not be secondary to form. Instead of separating fabrication from concept modeling or data analysis, she proposes, designers should create a seamless object by integrating these tasks. She presented interesting projects in which she used a single material to perform multiple functions. Her work is mostly inspired by nature.

One of her interesting projects is a medical device for those who suffer from Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. This syndrome is a medical condition in which the median nerve is compressed at the wrist, leading to numbness, muscle atrophy, and weakness in the hand. At present, most patients are recommended to wear gloves that are composed of two separate materials which perform different functions; a soft cushion and a hard metal (see left). As an alternative, she developed a “skin” with a single material by mapping the pain-profile and distributing hard and soft materials to fit the patient’s anatomical and physiological requirements, limiting movement in a customized fashion (see right). Her project is called as Carpal Skin.

Overall, her argument is interesting; designers may produce a better product when they perform a series of design tasks simultaneously (e.g., selecting a form and materials together) than when they go through the same tasks sequentially (e.g., selecting a form and then selecting materials).

Jane McGonial, a game designer and a presenter on TED, visited U of Toronto and presented her work, How we can harness the power of video games to solve real-world problems. She made an interesting argument and shared various interesting examples of games that help us individually and collectively. In her presentation, she argued that (1) games have unnecessary obstacles that people want to tackle (and therefore people are immersed in games) and that (2) the real world is too easy and too simple compared to the game world (and therefore people do not pay attention to the real-world problems). When the real-world problems have the elements of games, she expected, people would put their strengths to better use and challenge the real-world obstacles. She began with two games that help people achieve individual goals. For example, Nike+ helps people work out more and Foursquare helps people interact more. More interesting examples came from a series of games that tackle real-world issues. The first example is Groundcrew. People play this game and help the farmers in their neighborhood. The second and the most interesting example was Urgent Evoke. This is an online reality game that the World Bank Institute and infoDev launched in the early 2010 to support social innovation among young people. In this game, players become superheroes, set up their own superhero teams, and choose one of missions such as water crisis and food security. Her examples of the bright side of games continued to cooperative websites in which game players solve puzzles for science! (Foldit) or even design RNA for scientists! (EteRNA).

---

Piao, S., & Joo, J. (2022). A behavioral strategy to nudge young adults to adopt in-person counseling: Gamification. Behavioral Sciences, 12(2), 40.

Abstract Mental illness has always been an important issue for young adults. Moreover, initiatives resulting from the outbreak of COVID‐19 have had an even greater impact on the mental health of young adults. This study sought to examine the effect of gamification on whether young adults adopt in‐person counseling. One hundred twenty young adults (42 males and 78 females) with an average age of 29 years participated in our experiment. In the experiment, a 2 (Gamification: no vs. yes) × 2 (Vividness: low vs. high) between‐subjects design was employed. In the “yes” gamification condition, participants decided whether or not to read introductory material about in‐person counseling, and also whether or not to adopt in‐person counseling in the future. The results of the study show that: (1) gamification increased adoption, (2) participants’ perception of subjective usability of in‐person counseling mediated the effect of gamification to adoption, and (3) vividness of presentation moderated subjective usability. Our study demonstrated that gamification nudges young adults to adopt in‐person counseling while subjective usability mediates the relationship, and vividness moderates the relationship between gamification and subjective usability. Our findings provide counselors fresh insights into motivating people to access counseling services. Keywords gamification; adoption; usability; vividness; counseling; nudge

Last summer, I visited two design consulting firms in California: IDEO and Jump Associates. Visiting them raised several interesting research questions.

In the Jump Associates, I was impressed by its space. It occupies two floors in one building and the two floors are connected by a steel stair “inside the building,” so that employees can freely go up and down without using the external elevator (picture).

Besides, Jump Associates has several interesting rooms including “Zen Room” (picture). This room has a low ceiling with several cushions. The Zen Room is often used for consumers who want to express their needs and ideas in a warm, comfortable setting. This is interesting because I have not seen any work telling the value of small sized space with a low ceiling. Instead, much work suggests that high ceiling facilitates creativity.

I wonder if spaces (rooms and their ceiling heights) are carefully selected for different stage gates of a product development process. Designers may want to collect consumer needs in a low-ceiling, close space but they may want a high-ceiling, open space to generate concepts.

Prototypes have different forms. According to an article written by two apple computer employees, Houde and Hill (1997), prototypes prototype the “role” of a product, its “look and feel,” or its “implementation.” Therefore, designers should choose a right type of a prototype.

One step further, prototypes serve different roles. When I visited IDEO last summer, I found three boards which describe what prototypes do; they “inspire,” “experiment (evolve),” or “validate (specify)” a product. This suggests that different types of prototypes can serve different purposes for a product.

Given that there are different types of prototypes and different objectives of prototypes, designers should create different types of prototypes for different objectives. For instance, the “role” prototype can be more appropriate when designers inspire a product, while the “look and feel” prototype can be better when designers validate a product.