Tag Archives: Need for uniqueness

Why is 이정후 more expensive than Jung Hoo Lee?

At Oracle Park, I watched the San Francisco Giants play the San Diego Padres. Jung Hoo Lee, a former star in the Korean baseball league stole a second base that day.

During a break in the game, I noticed a non-Korean person wearing a jersey with his name in Korean (이정후) printed in bold Korean letters on the back. It was not J. H. Lee.

Later, back at home, I went to mlbshop.com out of curiosity. The official Nike t-shirt with “J. H. Lee” was priced at $44.99. But the same shirt, with “이정후” on the back, cost $49.99. It was five dollars more and sold out.

I checked the prices of other players’ shirts. Matt Chapman’s shirt also cost $44.99. Logan Webb’s was slightly cheaper at $39.99. Jorge Soler, who is no longer on the team, was listed for just $19.99. Among them, the version with Korean script was the most expensive.

From a marketing perspective, this price difference reflects the interesting psychology of fans. One reason could be uniqueness. Fans might want to be unique and choose the Korean version to feel rare. Another reason might be authenticity. Wearing the player’s name in his native language could feel more genuine. Finally, there might also be a sense of community. Wearing the Korean version might signal a shared cultural identity.

Fans often sacrifice convenience and pursue originality. They want to express identity, value, and/or a sense of belonging.

**

Reference

Smith, R. K., Vandellen, M. R., & Ton, L. A. N. (2021). Makeup who you are: Self-expression enhances the perceived authenticity and public promotion of beauty work. Journal of Consumer Research, 48(1), 102–122.

Although consumers put substantial effort toward their appearance, engaging in beauty work is often seen as inauthentic, posing challenges for beauty companies that increasingly rely on social media-driven product promotion where authenticity perceptions are consequential. This article draws on existentialist notions of authenticity (wherein the true self is created rather than innate) to explore how framing beauty work as self-expression alters others’ perceptions and, in turn, marketing outcomes. First, an archival analysis of Instagram posts demonstrates that rebranding beauty work as self-expression is positively associated with word-of-mouth about beauty products. Six studies then test how motivational information alters perceptions of people who engage in beauty work. Lowered authenticity perceptions arise from observers’ default assumption that beauty work is motivated by self-enhancement and serves primarily to conceal appearances. By contrast, self-expression enhances authenticity by leading others to see beauty work as a form of creation rather than concealment. This pattern extends to when people engage in a variety of beauty work transformations but not when beauty work is designed to restore appearances or is framed as connected to the innate self. These findings provide insight into judgments of authenticity and the management of a stigma associated with product use.

Less is better for flower?

At Nicolai Bergmann, a flower shop in Seoul, I noticed two preserved flower arrangements.

One was overfilled with blooms, spilling out of its display.

The other was neatly arranged inside a square box.

The overfilled one caught my attention first, but after looking at both, I chose the boxed arrangement. Why? When comparing them side by side, I started thinking about something that was harder to judge—the actual amount of flowers. The boxed one felt more balanced, structured, and perhaps even more valuable. I imagine many other visitors would come to the same conclusion

This reminds me of a study by Chris Hsee. In his experiment, people preferred the look of an overfilled ice cream cup with 7 ounces of ice cream over an underfilled one with 8 ounces. But when asked how much they would pay, they were willing to spend more on the underfilled cup ($1.85 vs. $1.56). Why? When evaluating the ice cream separately, they focused on an easy-to-judge factor—whether it looked full or not. But when comparing them together, they paid attention to the harder-to-judge factor—the actual amount of ice cream.

When making choices, we might be drawn to what looks impressive at first glance. But when we take a moment to compare, we start to value things differently.

***

Reference

Hsee, C. K. (1998). Less is better: When low‐value options are valued more highly than high‐value optionsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making11(2), 107-121.

This research demonstrates a less-is-better effect in three contexts: (1) a person giving a $45 scarf as a gift was perceived to be more generous than one giving a $55 coat; (2) an overfilled ice cream serving with 7 oz of ice cream was valued more than an underfilled serving with 8 oz of ice cream; (3) a dinnerware set with 24 intact pieces was judged more favourably than one with 31 intact pieces (including the same 24) plus a few broken ones. This less-is-better effect occurred only when the options were evaluated separately, and reversed itself when the options were juxtaposed. These results are explained in terms of the evaluability hypothesis, which states that separate evaluations of objects are often infuenced by attributes which are easy to evaluate rather than by those which are important.