The purpose of this study was to investigate how Design Executive Officers (DEOs) manage creative employees. It differs from prior leadership research in creative industries in three ways; it focused on DEOs, specified their influences on an organisational level, and discovered Korea-specific insights. We conducted in-depth interviews with the seven DEOs who have run their own design agencies for over ten years and hired more than 50 employees in Korea. Our thematic analysis of the 287 quotations collected revealed that 75% of the quotations fit the existing leadership framework and the remaining 25% are two unique attributes of DEO leadership: attitudes toward deeds and business growth. We further verified our thematic analysis by recruiting DEOs and conducting an online survey. Our findings contribute to the academic discussion on design-driven entrepreneurship by shedding light on the changing role of designers in the entrepreneurial landscape.
… More specifically, we found that DEOs differ from CEOs in two aspects: attitudes towards leadership and business growth. These two unique attributes led DEOs to manage their organisations at a strategic level. While we aimed to understand the two unique attributes, we found several interesting behaviours of the DEOs who run their own Small- Medium Enterprises in Korea. For instance, they often emphasized a collective culture to overcome a lack of autonomy in their projects, answer demanding requests from clients, and deliver more than what clients requested, all of which was mainly driven by a hierarchical relationship between clients and agencies. (pp. 329-330)
… We want to highlight that our findings clearly demonstrate that designers shift their roles in the entrepreneurial landscape. Differently from prior work focusing exclusively on design tasks (Lima & Sangiorgi, 2018; Maciver, 2016; Nam & Jung, 2008) or design activities (Giudice & Ireland, 2013; Gloppen, 2009; Jevnaker, 2000), our findings shed light on how DEOs go beyond design to manage employees and address complex problems creatively. Indeed, the roles of CEOs in design companies described in the prior research are limited to supporters. They encouraged designers to concentrate on design tasks, made decisions beyond styling on behalf of designers, or shared the value of design with other employees or customers (Song & Chung, 2008). However, we found that DEOs played active roles in their organisations. (pg. 330)
… This company (Woowa Brothers (woowa is Korean for “elegance”) developed a mobile application (app) for food delivery services in 2010. Interestingly, the CEO of this company was trained as a designer and worked as a designer for several Web consultancies and an Internet search-engine company… Woowa Brothers achieved 77.3% brand awareness at a total cost of $74,000, whereas similar services spent approximately $4 million and only reached 38.8%. This app achieved 10 million downloads for the first time in the Korean app history. Goldman Sachs decided to invest 40 billion Korean won (U.S. $33.1 million) into the company in 2014.
… We collected leadership cues from two parties, the CEO and employees, and then mapped them onto Brunswik’s Lens Model, a psychological framework often used in Social Judgment Theory. Our newly adopted research framework helps us better understand the designer’s unique leadership style; unlike non-design business CEOs, the design CEO or DEO (Design Executive Officer) used a wide variety of visual cues… the DEO tacitly communicates visual (tangible) cues with employees for reward and authorization. In particular, the DEO is good at incorporating a tangible benefit and infusing a live and vivid characteristic into an environment. We found that the DEO utilizes visual cues effectively when communicating leadership.
… This company (
… We collected leadership cues from two parties, the CEO and employees, and then mapped them onto